Those that oppose it seem to focus on the "sanctity" of marriage, but that argument seems to be fallacious when one considers that the majority of heterosexual marriages in this country end in divorce. If marriage is sacred, why have we made it so easy to dissolve one?
At any rate, it's hard to rationally counter the shouting of the religious right on this topic, unless you're comfortable with debating the finer points of biblical texts. Burt Constable's column "Don't remember the Maine vote, just keep eyes on gay prize," does a good job of it with a discussion of Rev. Gilbert H. Caldwell, a retired, black, heterosexual, Methodist minister who is a new member of the Board of Parents, Family and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG).
This week's vote in Maine against gay rights was disappointing, but Caldwell calls it another example of "letting the majority determine the rights of the minority." If not for court decisions upholding the rights of the minority, some states still might vote to ban interracial marriage or integrated schools, Caldwell notes.You might expect a retired minister to be fluent with biblical texts, and Rev. Caldwell, who was an active participant in the fight for civil rights in the early 1960s with Martin Luther King, does not disappoint.
People who use the Bible to deny rights to gays, "use the Bible to sustain their bias," Caldwell says. "And that, to me, does great damage to the sacred book for those of us who are Christian. I say we've done damage to the depth and breath of scripture when we have used the Bible as a book to bash people."There is a certain calming influence to Rev. Caldwell's words. He urges us to be steadfast and not be discouraged and to continue to seek equality for everyone. He paraphrases a Martin Luther King quote "Today we know with certainty that segregation is dead. The only question remaining is how costly will be the funeral":
Caldwell says the days when civil rights belong only to the heterosexual population are dying. "We're in the funeral-making with heterosexualism," Caldwell says, employing a word he lumps in with racism and sexism. "We just have to figure out how long that will be."
1 comment:
ABSOLUTELY!! Picking and choosing specific Biblical texts (or portions thereof) has been used for centuries by a party in power (majority) to justify oppression of whomever they wish. The Bible was used to justify slavery, to justify denying women the right to vote, and those are just the two most prominent examples in this country's history.
I was not married in a Church. I was not married in a religious ceremony. I don't understand that the fact that I am female and my husband is male makes my marriage any more 'sanctified' than that of two persons of the same gender.
Post a Comment